Digital records are no longer a forward-looking recommendation for UK care homes. As of December 2025, 82% of provider locations have adopted a digital social care record. CQC inspectors now routinely request remote access to them. This article sets out what the regulations require, what inspectors actually look for, and what your software needs to produce.
Connect with us about care home software · · Replies within 24 hours
The legal basis for care home record-keeping requirements is Regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. It requires providers to maintain records that are accurate, complete, and kept securely. The regulation does not specify digital records: it specifies good records. But the practical expectation from CQC has shifted considerably.
Records under Regulation 17 must be:
Failure to maintain compliant records underpins a significant proportion of Regulation 17 enforcement actions. It is also one of the most common reasons a home is rated Requires Improvement in the Safe or Well-Led key questions.
CQC now conducts both on-site visits and remote evidence reviews. When a care home uses digital records, inspectors can request access to the system from outside the home. This is a practical change with significant implications.
CQC's own guidance is explicit: where digital records are available and accessible, inspectors will not ask for paper copies. They will only request specific formats where necessary for regulatory decision-making or enforcement. The working expectation during inspections is digital access, reviewed remotely or on-site through the provider's system.
CQC changed its assessment framework in December 2024, moving from scoring at evidence category level to scoring at quality statement level. Inspectors therefore read your records as evidence rather than as a bureaucratic check. The records must show whether you meet the quality statements in Safe, Caring, Responsive, Effective and Well-Led.
CQC inspectors do not work through a simple checklist. They are looking for evidence of how care is being planned, delivered, and reviewed. Digital records need to support that narrative, not just hold data fields. The key areas are:
Care plans need to be person-centred, not template-driven. They should describe what matters to the individual, how they want to be supported, their preferences, and their assessed needs. Inspectors ask three things of a care plan. It must reflect the person as an individual. It must be reviewed and updated as needs change. The staff delivering care must work to what it says. A system that produces the same field-filled plan for every resident will not support a Good or Outstanding rating in Caring.
Medicines management is one of the areas CQC examines most closely. Under Regulation 12 (Safe Care and Treatment) as well as Regulation 17, providers must keep accurate records of medicines administration. MAR charts must show every dose: given, refused, or omitted, and with clear notation of the reason for any omission. Gaps are treated as potential evidence of unsafe practice.
Electronic MAR systems are now the norm in most registered homes. CQC guidance acknowledges that eMAR promotes clarity and reduces error risk through standardisation. But inspectors are clear that the system does not remove the provider's accountability for safe administration, competent staff, and effective oversight. An eMAR that shows consistent gaps or irregularities raises the same concerns as a paper MAR with the same problems.
Every incident must be documented promptly with the full circumstances, actions taken, and follow-up. Inspectors look at patterns across incident logs. Consider a home with frequent falls and no matching review of the resident's risk assessment or care plan. That pattern shows poor governance, and the individual records can each look correct. Your system needs to support root cause analysis and show that lessons are being identified and acted on.
Risk assessments should be current, specific, and referenced from care plans. A risk assessment completed at admission and not reviewed for six months is a common finding in Requires Improvement reports. Systems need to support scheduled review prompts and to link risk assessments clearly to the relevant care plan sections.
Inspectors checking whether a home is Well-Led will look at whether the provider can evidence that the people delivering care are trained and competent. DBS checks, mandatory training completion dates, supervision records, and competency assessments all need to be current and accessible. A separate HR or workforce module usually holds this. It must still connect to the picture of safe staffing that inspectors examine.
Connect with us about care home software · · Replies within 24 hours
The Digitising Social Care (DiSC) programme, run by NHS England, maintains an Assured Solutions List of digital social care record systems. Systems on this list have been assessed against national standards for functionality, security, data interoperability, and the ability to safeguard sensitive information. Access to the NHS's £25 million funding for digital records is conditional on choosing a system from this list.
The technical standards that assured DSCR systems must meet include:
The NHS England "What Good Looks Like" (WGLL) framework describes the digital maturity levels that health and care organisations should be working toward. The framework sets out seven dimensions for social care providers. Well Led, Ensure Smart Foundations, Safe Practice, Support Workforce, Empower People, Improve Care, and Healthy Populations.
Digital records feature across multiple dimensions. The framework expects leaders to understand the benefits of digital technology and drive adoption, not just tolerate it. Ensure Smart Foundations means having a modern, secure digital infrastructure with staff access to comprehensive, up-to-date records. Safe Practice means good data security to safely use and share information that improves care. The framework is aspirational, and it sets no hard minimum threshold for an individual provider. CQC inspectors still use it as a reference point for good governance.
The government's stated ambition is that all CQC-registered care providers are "fully digitised" by the end of the current Parliament. The DiSC programme has confirmed that aim repeatedly. Fully digitised means using an assured DSCR solution meeting the DSPT "standards met" level. The 18% of providers not yet using a digital social care record are increasingly outliers.
Translating all of this into practical requirements, a care home system that will hold up under CQC inspection needs to:
A system that does all of this inside the normal flow of a working day supports inspection readiness. It asks your staff for no extra documentation task. The alternative is a system you prepare for the night before the inspector arrives.
Six of the seven requirements above are features. A supplier can add a review prompt or a person-centred plan template to an existing product.
One of them is not a feature. An audit trail that nobody can edit or delete is a property of how a system stores data, and no supplier adds it later.
We build care systems on engage.re. Every entry is an event that carries a hash of the event before it, so an alteration breaks the chain and becomes detectable. A nurse's medication entry, an incident log and a care plan review therefore keep their evidential weight. The record reads the same three years later as on the day it was written. Each record also carries its own retention class, and a legal hold makes a record resist deletion while an investigation is open.
Inspector access follows from the same design. Your records sit in one estate rather than across a records system, a rota tool and a spreadsheet. An inspector therefore navigates one system, and every read they perform is itself a recorded event.
We set out the evidential question in who answers when an AI agent gets it wrong. We cover retention and erasure in can you prove you deleted someone's data.
Our live care home demo opens without a login, and it covers the workflows in this article. Sign in as a nurse to see CQC evidence generated from daily notes. Sign in as owner to export the inspection pack. It is a working system rather than a screenshot.
There is no single piece of legislation that currently sets a hard deadline requiring all care homes to use digital records. The obligation under Regulation 17 is to keep good records, not specifically digital ones. But the practical distinction between mandated and expected is collapsing.
Four facts now hold at once. 91% of people in care are covered by a digital social care record. CQC inspectors routinely request digital access. Government funding depends on using DSCR-assured software. The stated goal is full digitisation by the end of Parliament. The question is therefore which system to adopt, and how to make it work.